No client active today

Clear Path Solutions is a demonstration workspace, open to anyone and read-only. The documents behind it are a real consulting engagement; the states, conflicts and supersessions are what OIDA derived from them.Create your own workspace

Review

14 proposals waiting. Nothing here answers questions until a person approves it.

ClearPath suspects the audit bottleneck is the review-and-sign-off step but has never measured it.audit-bottleneck-location · Audit and quality workflowpriya.anand@clearpath-solutions.itWaiting 58 minProposed: cut the time from first client contact to kickoff from three or four weeks to two.intake-cycle-target · Client intake and scopingpriya.anand@clearpath-solutions.itWaiting 58 minThe number of team leaders and their authority is an open question: the brief says six, the interview said four.team-lead-count · ClearPath Solutionspriya.anand@clearpath-solutions.itWaiting 58 minMarco Fiore states he is managing five active clients at once.team-lead-client-load · Client intake and scopingyuki.tanaka@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minA junior auditor estimates the same audit phase at two to three days.audit-cycle-time · Audit and quality workflowyuki.tanaka@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: time to meaningful autonomy is six and a half to seven weeks, from observation and recollection rather than instrumentation.onboarding-duration-estimate · Consultant onboardingmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: design a tiered audit review while acknowledging it may fail for the same cultural reasons as before.audit-review-model · Audit and quality workflowmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed in the preview: an audit queue of two to three days at most.audit-cycle-recommendation · Audit and quality workflowmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: junior consultant turnover is about eighteen percent a year, estimated from hiring frequency, never verified against HR data.junior-turnover-rate · ClearPath Solutionsmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: one person owns the onboarding curriculum and process improvement end to end, most likely by restructuring an existing role.operations-coordinator · ClearPath Solutionsmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: keep the severity ratings for risks seven and nine, which rest on smaller samples and are more inferential than the rest.bottleneck-severity-rating · Audit and quality workflownora.chen@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minThe kickoff summary circulated internally records about 78 staff in the Florence office.headcount-reported · ClearPath Solutionsnora.chen@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minProposed: a light-touch Milan review as an appendix, keeping the 1 December delivery, rather than a deep dive that would move it to mid-December.milan-assessment-depth · Milan satellite officenora.chen@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 minCertis Italia is the direct competitor in the home market, at a comparable size and under pricing pressure.direct-competitor · ClearPath Solutionsmarcus.webb@meridian-labs.comWaiting 58 min
ProposalMilan satellite officemilan-assessment-depthcp-milan-light-touch-proposed
Proposed: a light-touch Milan review as an appendix, keeping the 1 December delivery, rather than a deep dive that would move it to mid-December.Proposed by nora.chen@meridian-labs.com · 24 Oct 2026
What changes if you approve it
TodayNo decisionAssistants are told OIDA does not know
After approvallight-touch appendixSet for Milan satellite office
Its source weighs 0.50, under the 0.75 bar, so answers will say not enough evidence.
Why it is here
Proposed decisionProposed directly by a person. Proposing and approving stay separate acts.
Evidence
“My recommendation is the light-touch approach, which will give Thomas the operational picture he wants while keeping December 1 delivery intact.”Verified in the source text · To client — re: change to requirements · project-noteOpen source →
See where this decision applies →
In reviewed mode an owner or an administrator decides. You can read the evidence.