No client active today

Clear Path Solutions is a demonstration workspace, open to anyone and read-only. The documents behind it are a real consulting engagement; the states, conflicts and supersessions are what OIDA derived from them.Create your own workspace

The ontology

Version 1 is in force since 23 Oct 2026. Every change goes through a proposal that an owner or an administrator approves.

Version 1In force
✓Version 1In force23 Oct 2026+ name "ClearPath Solutions — operational proce…"; + description "Compliance documentation firm in Floren…"; + class organisation; + class person; + class team; + class process; + class system; + class deliverable; + class project; + relation owns; + relation runs; + relation blocks; + relation delivers; + relation supports; + relation employs; + decision type general; + decision type scope; + decision type commercial; + decision type governance; + decision type process-change; + decision type measurement; + decision type prioritisation; + decision type tooling; + scope global; + scope engagement; + scope onboarding; + scope client-intake; + scope audit-workflow; + scope reporting; + scope knowledge-management; + scope milan; + authority contract 0.9; + authority decision-record 0.9; + authority approved-policy 0.9; + authority engagement-report 0.85; + authority specification 0.8; + authority conversation 0.8; + authority observation-note 0.7; + authority meeting-notes 0.6; + authority wiki-page 0.6; + authority brief 0.5; + authority project-note 0.5; + authority operational-data 0.5; + authority text 0.5; + authority chat 0.4; + authority market-research 0.4; + alias sow "contract"; + alias statement-of-work "contract"; + alias agreement "contract"; + alias decision "decision-record"; + alias policy "approved-policy"; + alias report "engagement-report"; + alias deliverable "engagement-report"; + alias requirements "specification"; + alias spec "specification"; + alias observation "observation-note"; + alias field-note "observation-note"; + alias meeting "meeting-notes"; + alias minutes "meeting-notes"; + alias wiki "wiki-page"; + alias project-brief "brief"; + alias proposal "brief"; + alias email "project-note"; + alias note "project-note"; + alias dataset "operational-data"; + alias csv "operational-data"; + alias document "text"; + alias slack "chat"; + alias team-chat "chat"; + alias benchmark "market-research"; + alias market-scan "market-research"; + resolver rule min_authority 0.75; + resolver rule min_confidence 0.6
Scopes8Decision types8Concepts7Source trust15Aliases and history

What kinds of decisions you record

Editable by proposal
Every record has one decision type. Retiring a type keeps its records and points to the type that replaces it.
general68
in force · 68 in totalThe engagement calendar holds eight weekly progress calls, which is the cadence the contract sets and not the one the kickoff agreed.steering-cadencedirect-competitorknowledge-repository-readinessorganisational-modelonboarding-durationaccess-provisioning-timeaudit-analysis-varianceonboarding-cycle-measuredengagement-windowonboarding-benchmarkgeographic-scopeboard-meeting-datebenchmark-sharinghistorical-data-availabilityteam-lead-rosterheadcount-reporteddocumentation-standards-confidenceaudit-analysis-scheduleintake-cycle-timecto-availabilityboard-presentation-datedata-access-windowretention-root-causeworkshop-agreementpeer-review-precedentteam-lead-countonboarding-measurementworkflow-trackinglegacy-system-useintake-assignmentjunior-turnovertemplate-governancemilan-headcountheadcountclient-data-turnaroundbottleneck-severityknowledge-source-preferenceknowledge-channelwiki-statusreport-reusecompliance-matrix-qualityreport-templatestandards-monitoringsignoff-queue-depthaudit-cycle-timeaudit-stage-timingteam-lead-client-loadworkload-visibilityintake-current-practiceintake-session-timeonboarding-dependencyonboarding-structureinternal-communicationreport-assembly-timesignoff-dependencyaudit-bottleneck-locationaudit-queue-backlogheadcount-target
scope4
in force · 6 in totalThe review covers Florence, with a lighter Milan assessment delivered as an appendix on 1 December.geographic-scopemilan-assessment-depthreporting-depthsoftware-selectiontechnology-investment
commercial5
in force · 5 in totalProcess changes must be implementable within the existing €380K annual IT budget, without a major technology investment.tooling-budgetgoverning-lawdeliverable-ownershippayment-scheduleengagement-fee
governance12
in force · 13 in totalThe full final report is delivered on 1 December 2025.final-report-deliveryboard-presentation-dateobservation-protocolinitial-data-requestsystem-accesssteering-cadencedata-retentiondeliverable-review-periodchange-authorityprimary-contactengagement-duration
process-change4
in force · 6 in totalDocumentation moves to one central repository on existing systems first, before any platform is chosen.knowledge-repositoryintake-standardaudit-review-modeloperations-coordinatorprovisioning-sla
measurement3
in force · 10 in totalTeam utilisation moves from 68% to 75% by June 2026, seven percentage points.team-utilisation-targetaudit-cycle-targetonboarding-targetbottleneck-severity-ratingjunior-turnover-rateaudit-cycle-recommendationonboarding-duration-estimateintake-cycle-target
prioritisation4
in force · 5 in totalImplementation begins on 6 January 2026 with the quick wins.implementation-startpresentation-structuredelivery-sequenceimplementation-priority
tooling1
in force · 1 in totalA knowledge management platform is selected and implemented in phase two, at €5K–€20K a year.knowledge-platform